<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>IALA &#187; Brookings Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="http://learningalternatives.net/weblog/post/category/brookings-institute/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://learningalternatives.net</link>
	<description>The International Association for Learning Alternatives</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 18:24:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Recent Reports on Choice</title>
		<link>http://learningalternatives.net/weblog/post/332/</link>
		<comments>http://learningalternatives.net/weblog/post/332/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 20:36:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wayne Jennings</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alternatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brookings Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Choices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prog Policy Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://learningalternatives.net/?p=332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="Public Policy Institute.gif" src="/wp-content/uploads/legacy/mainblog/archives/Public%20Policy%20Institute.gif" width="120" height="50" align="left" hspace=5 />Two recent reports call for school reform on a large scale.<br />
<em><a href="http://www.ppionline.org/ppi_ci.cfm?knlgAreaID=110&#038;subsecid=181&#038;contentid=253740">Put Learning First</a></em> by Paul Hill recommends that school boards hold a &#8220;portfolio&#8221; of educational options, each different, some contracted for but all with major site decisions over program, staffing and budgets. The school board would fund and monitor the magnet, traditional, charter, at-risk, district, etc. schools for performance. Their <img alt="gettingchoiceright.gif" src="/wp-content/uploads/legacy/mainblog/archives/gettingchoiceright.gif" width="100" height="149" align=right hspace=5 /> public oversight would be tight regulation over civil rights and student performance but loose regulation on procedures.</p>
<p><em><a href="http://www.brookings.edu/press/books/schoolchoicepolicydesign.htm">Getting Choice Right</a></em> from the Progressive Policy Institute suggests ways to better design school choice policies to reach all students and families. This collection of essays, an outgrowth of discussions by a panel, addresses processes for education choices not whether to have them. The panel determined choice is here to stay and it&#8217;s a matter of how it&#8217;s managed and promoted regarding equity, resources and accountability.</p>
<p>Both of these important reports thoughtfully review critical issues regarding choice in readable formats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://learningalternatives.net/weblog/post/332/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Recent Reports on Vouchers and Educational Choices</title>
		<link>http://learningalternatives.net/weblog/post/124/</link>
		<comments>http://learningalternatives.net/weblog/post/124/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2004 16:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wayne Jennings</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brookings Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vouchers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://learningalternatives.net/?p=124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Evaluation of the Cleveland Scholarship and Tutoring Program: 1998-2002&#8243; by the Indiana Center for Evaluation presents the accumulated findings of a four-year study of Cleveland&#8217;s voucher program.
As part of a recently passed spending bill, the U.S. Congress created a publicly funded voucher program for the District of Columbia. The bill provides $13 million to cover [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.ecs.org/html/offsite.asp?document=http://www.indiana.edu/~iuice/rprt_rqs.html">&#8220;Evaluation of the Cleveland Scholarship and Tutoring Program: 1998-2002&#8243;</a> by the Indiana Center for Evaluation presents the accumulated findings of a four-year study of Cleveland&#8217;s voucher program.</p>
<p>As part of a recently passed spending bill, the U.S. Congress created a <a href="http://www.ecs.org/html/offsite.asp?document=http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A40071-2004Jan22?language=printer">publicly funded voucher program for the District of Columbia.</a> The bill provides $13 million to cover vouchers of up to $7,500 for at least 1,700 children once the program is phased in. Children in families whose household income does not exceed 185% of the federal poverty line will receive priority.</p>
<p>The Brookings Institution established the National Working Commission on Choice in K-12 Education to explore how CHOICE works and to examine how communities interested in the potential benefits of new school options. The commission&#8217;s report, entitled <a href="http://www.brookings.edu/gs/brown/20031117schoolchoicereport.htm">&#8220;School Choice: Doing It the Right Way Makes a Difference,&#8221;</a> explores choice in terms of four key issues: benefits to children whose parents choose new schools; benefits to children whose families do not exercise choice; effects on the national commitment to equal opportunity and school desegregation; and advancement of social cohesion and common democratic values.</p>
<p><img src="/wp-content/uploads/legacy/Reports.jpg"></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://learningalternatives.net/weblog/post/124/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Study on Choices</title>
		<link>http://learningalternatives.net/weblog/post/94/</link>
		<comments>http://learningalternatives.net/weblog/post/94/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2003 04:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wayne Jennings</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brookings Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Choices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://learningalternatives.net/?p=94</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The National Working Commission on Choice in K-12 Education released its report, School Choice: Doing it the Right Way Makes a Difference after two years of study. The commission, chaired by Paul Hill and made up of both choice proponents and skeptics, found that there is &#8220;no free lunch&#8221; in education and that school choice [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.brook.edu/gs/brown/brown_hp.htm">National Working Commission on Choice in K-12 Education</a> released its report, <a href="http://www.brookings.edu/gs/brown/20031117schoolchoicereport.htm">School Choice: Doing it the Right Way Makes a Difference </a>after two years of study. The commission, chaired by Paul Hill and made up of both choice proponents and skeptics, found that there is &#8220;no free lunch&#8221; in education and that school choice schemes must be carefully designed.  The study makes clear that choice is here to stay.</p>
<p><img src="/wp-content/uploads/legacy/Brookings Institute.gif"></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://learningalternatives.net/weblog/post/94/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
